Walk into any neighbourhood shop in Dwarka early enough in the morning, and you'll catch the owner doing something that has nothing to do with commerce and everything to do with faith — lighting an agarbatti in front of a small framed photo tucked behind the counter, well before the first shutter fully lifts. It looks like a private ritual, and it is, but it's also strikingly ordinary once you realise almost every shopkeeper on earth is running some version of the same quiet ceremony. Strip away the specific gods, coins, and salt, and what you're left with is a global, remarkably consistent human habit: treating the first transaction of the day like it decides everything that follows.

Bohni in India and Pakistan: Why the First Sale of the Day Matters So Much

In India and Pakistan, this habit even has a name — bohni, the belief that the day's first sale sets the tone, in terms of luck, for every sale after it. Shopkeepers try to ensure the bohni transaction happens in cash, ideally at full price with no haggling, and customers are expected to be generous rather than difficult during it, since walking away from a genuine bohni buyer without a sale is considered inauspicious. In some regions, the first cash received gets spat upon lightly to ward off the evil eye, or touched reverently to each eye as a gesture of thanks. It's not unusual for a shopkeeper to chase a small loss on the first sale just to avoid an empty-handed opening.

Haal Khata in Bangladesh: Closing Old Ledgers to Start the Year Fresh

Bengali traders take this further once a year rather than once a day. On the first day of the Bengali calendar, shopkeepers close out their old ledgers entirely and open a fresh one in a custom called Haal Khata, inviting customers in to settle old debts and start clean. Hindu traders mark the occasion with a special puja, while Muslim shopkeepers write "Bismillah" at the top of the new ledger before a single entry goes in. Sweets and small gifts get handed out to customers as part of the ceremony — a shop essentially resetting its relationship with everyone who owes it money, once a year, on purpose.

What Is Genetic Trauma? A Concept That Went Mainstream Through TV

The HBO series Watchmen introduced a lot of people to a phrase that sounds almost like science fiction: genetic trauma, the idea that whatever your ancestors lived through might still be sitting somewhere inside you, encoded rather than just remembered. It's a striking idea for a superhero show to drop casually into dialogue, and it stuck with viewers for good reason — most of us already suspect, in some vague unscientific way, that we're carrying more from our families than just their eye colour and their taste in food. The question worth actually answering is whether that suspicion holds up to scrutiny, or whether it's just a good line dressed up as biology.

Genetic Trauma vs Generational Trauma: Why the Terms Get Confused

These two phrases get used interchangeably online, which muddies the water considerably. Generational trauma — sometimes called intergenerational or transgenerational trauma — is a well-established concept in psychology describing how the emotional and behavioural aftermath of trauma gets passed down through families: parenting styles shaped by fear, silence around painful history, anxiety absorbed by children who never lived through the original event at all. Genetic trauma is a much narrower, far more contested claim — that trauma can leave an actual biological mark on your DNA's packaging, one inheritable through eggs or sperm. One is broadly accepted in family psychology. The other is a genuinely fascinating, still-unsettled area of science called epigenetics.

The Mouth Keeps Score Even When the Mind Won't Admit It

The Farm is not your regular slasher movie. In fact, it is unlike any of the slasher-slaughter movies you might have seen. So, you might wonder, what makes it worth the recommendation? Honestly, nothing as such! Easy to access on YouTube, this horror genre movie is instantly accessible via such links, but please don't watch it for the body horror special effects. Overall, the level of gore is more suggestive than something that will make your stomach churn. This is not Hostel or The Human Centipede, but a very restrained form of body horror storytelling. At no point does The Farm grab attention with body-slashing special effects. It is the theme of the movie that gets to you. Just consider human beings raised on a farm, against their will, and treated as animals. The vegetarians might instantly call out that such content needs to be shown to sensitize people about the horrors of animal husbandry, but I guess anybody can watch the movie without being asked about their dietary preferences. The movie borrows many horror-genre ideas, including human subjugation, captive horror, lactating crimes, and human meat as a product. It blends all of these into one quick storytelling format. I believe it's quick because there is no real build-up to the story. There is no emphasis on explaining the reasons people do something so hideous. The Farm YouTube movie is without regrets or explanation. The first aspect of this movie that will make you not explore another title is the music. It gets to you from the first scene itself. The background score is creepy and twisted, and it evolves and adapts as the story gathers some momentum.

A Brief History of Gas: How Civilizations Constructed Shame

Humanity did not always pretend that flatulence was a scandal. In ancient Greece, bodily noises were considered signs of vitality; philosophers wrote casually about the body’s expulsions as part of life’s natural functioning. The Roman physician Galen treated digestive gas as an expected product of human physiology rather than a moral flaw. Even the Old Testament mentions flatulence with pragmatic indifference, without attaching stigma. Shame was not the default — it was a cultural invention. The medieval period transformed the body into a moral landscape. Christian monasticism placed heavy emphasis on bodily discipline, self-control, and suppression of earthly urges. Scholars studying medieval bodily regulation note how monasteries structured silence as virtue; noises from the body became intrusions from the lower self, the sinful self. Flatulence transitioned from a natural occurrence to a spiritual weakness. The idea that the body must be subdued, contained, and purified seeped into social norms outside monastic life.

By the Victorian era, fart-shaming had matured into full-blown etiquette. Victorian manuals cautioned against “disruptive bodily functions” as assaults on public decorum. Meanwhile, British colonial power exported these norms globally, shaping bodily etiquette from India to Africa. What had once been a physiological inevitability now carried moral weight. A silent society was a civilized society — or so they insisted.

Yet outside the West, cultural responses varied. Many Indigenous communities treated flatulence with humor rather than shame, seeing laughter as a release valve for the social body. In some Pacific Island cultures, shared bodily humor strengthened interpersonal bonds. Anthropology reminds us: shame is not universal. But globalization ensured that Western bodily norms became the dominant export, and modern flatulence anxiety is, in many ways, a Victorian ghost that survived longer than the empire that birthed it.

The Psychology of Disgust: Why Farts Trigger Social Alarm

Disgust is one of humanity’s oldest emotional warning systems — a survival mechanism designed to keep us away from pathogens long before microscopes could explain why. Psychologist Paul Rozin’s research on core disgust shows that humans are hardwired to avoid anything associated with contamination: rot, feces, spoiled food, bodily fluids, and airborne signals that imply proximity to them.

Flatulence exists in this psychological twilight zone. It does not directly harm, but it represents something potentially harmful. The nose processes it as a micro-alert: “There may be decay nearby.” The mind translates that into social discomfort: “Someone here has crossed an invisible boundary.” The gas itself is harmless; the meaning we attach to it is not.

But disgust alone doesn’t explain fart-shaming. What elevates it to humiliation is metadisgust — the fear of being perceived as disgusting. Humans dread becoming contaminated in someone else’s mental map. The shame is deeply social: being associated with something impure threatens group belonging, a primal need embedded in our evolutionary psychology. Once upon a time, being expelled from the group meant death. Today it means someone side-eyes you on a bus.

What’s striking is that disgust is asymmetrical. We tolerate our own body’s odors far more than those of others. Neurological studies show the brain’s reactions to self-generated smells are muted; identity modulates disgust. But the moment someone else contributes to the air, the amygdala lights up like a ceremonial bonfire. This asymmetry reveals an uncomfortable truth: fart-shaming is not really about gas. It is about the fragile architecture of social identity, where the body becomes a liability we must manage meticulously to remain acceptable.

The Colonial Body: How Western Manners Globalized Bodily Shame

The global spread of fart-shaming is not a natural evolution of etiquette; it is a result of cultural power. During colonization, European norms of bodily control were positioned as superior — cleaner, more rational, more refined — and Indigenous norms were dismissed as primitive. This hierarchy transformed the body into a political symbol. In colonial India, British authorities viewed local bodily practices — burping, spitting, passing gas without theatrics — as signs of uncivilized behavior. Victorian morality seeped into the Indian middle class through schooling, missionary education, and administrative hierarchies. Suddenly, the body that had always been allowed its noises was expected to behave like a machine with muted exhaust.

Similar patterns occurred in West Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Caribbean. Local humor around bodily functions was replaced by imported prudishness. An entire planet gradually internalized the idea that silence equals civilization. Even today, corporate spaces across continents maintain Western behavioral codes: airtight bodily discipline, tacit shame, and the expectation that one must conceal natural functions at all costs. Anthropologists argue that this forced bodily discipline created psychological distance between human beings and their own physiology. The colonized body became something to control rather than inhabit. Fart-shaming is one of its many lasting legacies — a small but persistent reminder of how power rewrites intimacy.

Gender, Power & Who Is Allowed to Make Noise

Fart-shaming is not gender-neutral. Women, across most cultures, face significantly harsher policing of bodily sounds than men. Sociologists note that femininity has historically been associated with cleanliness, delicacy, and restraint — ideals designed for male comfort more than female autonomy. The female body is expected to be an immaculate, scentless, quiet vessel, even though women have the same digestive systems as men and produce the same volume of gas.

Eroticized femininity contradicts biological reality, leaving women in a double bind: to be desirable, they must disavow their own intestines. The pressure is so strong that studies show women are more likely to suppress flatulence in shared spaces, even at the cost of physical pain. Meanwhile, boys grow up normalizing bodily humor, encouraged to treat gas as comedy rather than shame.

Men, however, are not exempt from the politics of noise. Masculinity produces its own paradox: men may joke about farting, but they are shamed when it happens in professional settings where the masculine ideal shifts from boisterous to controlled. The corporate male body must be sealed, efficient, sanitized — no gurgles permitted. Power modifies the rules. A powerful man may get away with a biological slip; a junior employee will not. Bodily noise becomes a class signal: those who must remain silent to keep their jobs cannot afford to be human out loud.

Flatulence, strangely enough, maps social inequality better than many political theories!

The Body Under Surveillance: Why Modern Life Intensifies Gas Anxiety

Modern environments — corporate offices, elevators, co-working spaces, open-plan designs — have turned the body into a performance object. Noise travels farther, privacy is thinner, and the expectation of constant composure is stricter than ever. When our ancestors lived outdoors or in acoustically chaotic settlements, flatulence had far more room to dissipate unnoticed. The modern world, however, traps sound. Air-conditioned conference rooms, metal train compartments, silent hospital waiting rooms — all make the body’s minor rebellions acoustically unforgiving. Today’s social spaces are built for efficiency, not humanity.

Then there’s digital surveillance. Social media thrives on humiliation. A small bodily accident can be filmed, uploaded, shared — a nightmare that inflates shame far beyond its biological relevance. The ancient fear of group exclusion now exists on a global scale. The cost of being the one who “did it” has never been higher.

Urban stress exacerbates digestion. Gastrointestinal researchers note that anxiety slows gut motility, producing more gas and less predictability. The very fear of fart-shaming increases the likelihood of an incident. The body rebels precisely when one needs it to behave. This cycle — anxiety → gas → suppression → more anxiety — is modernity’s gift. Every quiet office becomes a pressure cooker. Every meeting is a Russian roulette of intestinal diplomacy.

Humanity has never been more mechanized on the outside and more turbulent on the inside.

Humor as Sanctuary: The Social Function of Gas Laughter

Despite all the shame, flatulence remains one of the oldest forms of humor. Anthropologists studying tribal rituals, medieval festivals, and contemporary comedy agree on one thing: fart humor is universal, not because it is childish, but because it provides social relief.

Laughter at bodily sounds is not mockery; it is communal acknowledgment of shared biology. It resets the emotional climate. A well-timed laugh abolishes hierarchy, dissolving stiffness between people. The fart joke is a great equalizer — politicians, saints, professors, CEOs, soldiers, monks, and toddlers all emit gas. The humor reminds us that no one escapes the digestive contract of being human.

Some cultures elevate flatulence humor to a ritual. Certain Indigenous groups in North America used gas humor in storytelling as a teaching tool. In parts of Melanesia, exaggerated bodily humor appears in ceremonies to diffuse tension. Even in medieval Europe, fart jokes entered court entertainment — evidence that even royalty secretly granted the body a moment of rebellion.

Humor protects the psyche from shame by converting panic into recognition. When people laugh, the body is absolved. Strangely, humor is the most sophisticated response to flatulence: it is empathy disguised as mischief.

But contemporary society often suppresses bodily humor, replacing it with restraint and silent judgment. This makes fart-shaming more potent — humor was always the pressure valve, and modern adults have been taught to keep it shut.

Rituals of Escape: How Humans Manage the Rising Bubbles

When the intestinal orchestra begins its warm-up, humans employ a wide repertoire of survival techniques. Some are practical; others are pure folklore disguised as strategy. Across interviews, ethnographic notes, and observational studies, a taxonomy emerges. There’s The Strategic Exit — pretending to take a call, refill a water bottle, or suddenly needing to check something “urgent” at your desk. People learned this maneuver instinctively long before anyone wrote etiquette manuals. Then comes The Acoustic Masking Technique, where one waits for a loud external noise — a bus rumbling past, someone dropping a book — and releases micro-doses of gas in sync with ambient sounds. This is the jazz improvisation of bodily management: difficult, high-risk, occasionally brilliant.

There is the Postural Shift, a subtle weight redistribution intended to create silence by adjusting pressure on the pelvic floor. Sometimes it works; sometimes it creates a sound reminiscent of a balloon losing hope.

There’s also Cultural Camouflage — in households where cooking smells, festival firecrackers, or crowded gatherings create sensory overload, one blends into the atmosphere. Anthropologists recognize this as environmental opportunism.

But the most human ritual is The Internal Treaty: negotiating with one’s own gut. “Not now, please. I beg you.” It is the closest most adults come to prayer during office hours.

These strategies are often absurd, but they represent the ingenuity of a species desperate to uphold dignity while its intestines conduct their own foreign policy.

The Deeper Anxiety: Why We Fear Being Known Too Intimately

Fart-shaming thrives because it touches a primal nerve: the fear of being fully visible. Humans curate their identities carefully — through clothing, speech, posture, grooming, and social performance. But flatulence is the body’s reminder that identity is porous. The self leaks.

This leakage — literal and metaphorical — threatens the illusion of control. Embarrassment psychologists argue that shame is the emotional response to an unexpected collapse in self-presentation. Farts collapse the boundary between the cultivated self and the biological self. They reveal that beneath the polished persona is a digestive tube like everyone else’s.

For many, this exposure feels like intimacy before consent. It is being known too quickly, too truthfully. Flatulence forces vulnerability, which is why the shame cuts deeper than the act deserves.

But interestingly, intimate relationships often use bodily functions as milestones of trust. Couples who can laugh about gas tend to report higher relational satisfaction. Friendship deepens when people can be biologically honest around one another. Children bond through shared humor about bodily sounds long before they develop mature emotional language.

This suggests that fart-shaming is not inevitable. It is a cultural imposition, not a psychological necessity. The body doesn’t see shame in gas; society teaches us to.

Humans fear flatulence not because of the noise or smell, but because it reveals a truth we spend our lives avoiding: we are more animal than we admit.

Final Reflections

Somewhere between biology and etiquette, between instinct and embarrassment, the sound of gas escaping a human body becomes a quiet story about culture, power, intimacy, and vulnerability. Flatulence is not an offense; it is a reminder that the boundaries of selfhood are fragile and endlessly negotiated. Every bubble rising through the gut is an echo of the ancient tension between the disciplined body society demands and the untamed body evolution left us with. If there is an art to escaping fart-shaming, it lies not in tightening every muscle but in loosening the grip on dignity just enough to acknowledge that being human is messy, noisy, and occasionally hilarious — and that maybe the shame was never biologically ours to carry.

References (20 sources)

• https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/ae.2008.35.2.171
• https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/emo
• https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-11373-007
• https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579396/
• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916305705
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/26295410
• https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223980.2018.1468336
• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154618301844
• https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-36114-5
• https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
• https://www.smithsonianmag.com/
• https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science
• https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle
• https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/44442371
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
• https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10410236.2019.1574140
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/41471532
• https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07481187.2018.1443715

I have been taking Tryptomer [Amitriptyline hydrochloride] on and off for more than a decade. It was prescribed to me for GAD - Generalized Anxiety Disorder - that still remains and keeps surfacing in ways that are hard to describe. The primary salt here is Amitriptyline. If you Google it, it shows up as a tricyclic antidepressant. This also means that this prescription medicine has been around for a long time. Tricyclic antidepressants are considered a bit old school in terms of their pharmacology age. Chances are high that if you have been visiting a psychologist lately, this drug might not show up at all among all the possible salts that could help you. Yes, it is intended as a long-term use prescription medication.

It is not meant for short-term measures, such as controlling the sudden onset of anxiety. This makes Tryptomer an unlikely contender to be recommended for someone who is still within the initial rounds of consulting, still young to understand how mind medications work, and how it takes a measured combination of some salts to first conquer the immediate symptoms, then provide longer-term relief, and then become a part of your long-term strategy to keep away the symptoms. If you are worried about any of the depression prevention or anxiety control medications becoming a chronic part of your life, stay away from Tryptomer. Like I said, it is typically used as a long-term measure, and people using it for a decade or a couple of decades is quite common. If you Google search the typical applications of Tryptomer, things like nerve-related pain relief show up, but honestly, it does not have pain-relieving effects, and assuming that it will work wonders to reduce bodily pains induced by a constant state of anxiety is just expecting a bit too much. Most of the pharmacy stores don't store this medicine in large quantities.

The old-world charm has perhaps faded away entirely, but it is effective for me, where I have a combination of GAD and anxiety-linked IBS. There is something surprisingly effective about how Tryptomer has helped me in controlling diarrhea-predominant IBS symptoms. That constant sense of worry about untimely bowel movement and sudden changes in body weight was first controlled via Tryptomer. Initially, when my symptoms were acute, I needed as much as 75 mg Tryptomer daily, divided across 3 equal doses of 25 mg each. It takes a bit of time to build up. Give it a week, and if you have been suffering from IBS associated with anxiety or depression, Tryptomer should give you some remarkable results.

Never take Amitriptyline on an empty stomach! This is one rule I have followed for the longest time. Take it after meals, and be patient with it. Tryptomer will get the job done, but if you suffer from acute panic attacks, this is not the best option. For me, getting hooked on to Tryptomer happened after trying and failing at least 4 other prescription drugs, including Valium, Anti-Dep, Tancodpe, and Fluoxetine. Valium is just a short-term sedative at best. I believe it presents the highest chance of abuse. When you are really choking with anxiety, any medication that can give you quick symptomatic relief also presents a higher probability of causing substance abuse. This is where I have done well to be patient, giving each of the prescription drugs for anxiety control some time before trying the next one.

Tryptomer has a stomach-binding effect. Hard to explain in strictly medical terms, but understand it like this - it tends to tighten up and cement the nerves that connect your gut to your mind. This is as basic a definition as you will find online. As a result, the typical symptoms of IBS-D associated with long-term sufferers, such as acidity, bloating, undigested food, and cramping, are controlled with Tryptomer. Yes, the pitfall of sudden weight gain is there, but it is not the drug alone that is at work. Like most psychotic medications, Tryptomer can make you a bit sleepier, and this is when your daily schedule should help you keep away from gaining too much. For many people, Tryptomer is an outdated medication for those with classical, textbook symptoms of depression or anxiety, but for me, it has really worked! 

If you tend to believe medical wisdom borrowed from Google searches, you are likely to find that Tryptomer / Amitriptyline has been used for migraine prevention and for serious sleep issues. The latter scenario might still work in higher dosages. But, to be used as a means of extreme, splitting headache caused by a flare-up at home or office? Tryptomer would not be my recommendation!

• AVAILABILITY: not that easy to find in Delhi NCR. Prescription is a must.
• PRICING: not an expensive medication, given the usual rates of prescription meds for depression and anxiety.
• EASE OF USE: Try to take it after meals. Just might suit some when taken on an empty stomach, but that seems rare.
• SIDE EFFECTS: dry mouth and bloating might happen at the outset.
• SEDATION ISSUES: not that serious.
• ANTI-DEPRESSANT EFFECTS: moderate to good over a period.
• ANXIETY CONTROL EFFECTS: good in low dosages and longer periods.
• IBS CONTROL CAPABILITIES: impressive for IBS-D sufferers.
• INSOMNIA SUPPORT: reasonably good without being extreme.
• CONSTIPATION PROBABILITY: a bit higher than other substitutes.
• KICK-IN PERIOD: at least a week, as a minimum.
• RANGE OF INTERACTIONS: not much, rather limited.
• NEED TO RAISE THE DOSAGE PROGRESSIVELY: not really, unless your symptoms are getting out of control
• WHAT IS TRYPTOMER'S 'BINDING EFFECT'? This term is often used by your consulting neurologist or physician. It refers to the effect that Amitriptyline has on intestinal motility. It reduces excessive intestinal movement. Hence, it is effective against diarrhea-first type of IBS caused by anxiety. This is also what leads to a mild constipation effect at times. 

Common Indian Brands for Amitriptyline 

I came across this title idea when ruminating about a simple fact - lately, due to my generalized anxiety, I am becoming even more dependent on eating and snacking on sweet foods to feel alive and function in the present. Now, the discussion: There’s a new villain in the world of skin health, and it isn’t pollution, sunscreen laziness, or the sun itself — it’s sugar. Not the sugar you sprinkle on dessert, but the invisible sugar that binds itself stubbornly to proteins in your bloodstream, stiffening them, aging them, and quietly sabotaging your skin from beneath the surface. Glycation is the name of this process, and dermatologists are calling it “the skin sugar disease” because it behaves exactly like a metabolic condition — chronic, sneaky, and self-inflicted through lifestyle. You don’t feel it happening, but one day you look in the mirror and realise your skin has turned into a timeline you never approved.

Extremely fresh roti: Right off the tawa | Crispier | Steaming Hot

Fresh but smeared with desi ghee for a soft texture is the top-tier performer in this domain. Still fresh but left slightly more on the flame for some added crispiness and smeared with desi ghee, these fresh as the grass rotis can be kept soft with little crustiness or turned into Indian bread masterpieces by cranking up the crispiness. Ultra-crispy, the holy grail of ghar ki chapati, allowing desi ghee to gain entry through the crisped, broken surface that allows the ghee to penetrate deeper. If you are someone who does not like the ghee on the roti, you are missing out on life’s simplest and tastiest treats. The non-ghee fresh roti has a substantially shorter lifespan. You are much better off consuming it within a couple of minutes off the tawa. If your secondary sabzi, following the dal for the day, is a bit gooey, like paneer kee bhurjee or baigan ka bharta, the excessively crispy roti creates the perfect contrast. This is like eating those Mexican wraps where the fillings are a bit saucy & soft, placed carefully inside a tough bread. If you are having your meal in Delhi’s winters, the fresh roti with a few drops of ghee dripping makes up for any cooking deficits. Even yesterday’s leftovers seem to taste better when that perfect blend of cooked dough and a bit of ghee is churned, turned, clawed into, and mercilessly chewn by your teeth.

Not-that-Fresh | But Not Stale

Hot & Quite Soft | Not Crispy

It so often happens that there is a time lag of a few minutes from the roti being taken off the tawa and finding its rightful place on my plate, nestled comfortably on the sides by some onion, cucumber, and the primary sabzi for the day. This form of roti is rather acceptable and usually the norm given the crazy schedule where my meal timings have taken a serious battering in the last 4 years. This inherently softer version of Delhi’s chapati might be the mainstay in most households, PGs, workplaces, and across the lunch spread of millions who lunch parked somewhere, and those who have to stand and quickly swallow their food.

For any Indian lady who is proud to be the sole meal-time caretaker of a household, the performance of this not-that-fresh chapati is a testament to their cooking skills. You order the wrong type of atta, and these fresh but not-so-hot rotis will develop a dry texture very quickly. Rolled too thin, these reasonably fresh rotis will lose their softness even sooner. You have to know how our forefathers conquered the art of making chapatis and keeping them fresh beyond a few hours!

Not A Typical Roti | Hybrid Version 

Borrowed from Desi Parantha

Muchda-Kuchda Rotis are Mom’s Love & Not Artistry

Tracing the evolution of this form of Indian roti, it was found that our overzealous fore-mothers realized that the humble dhaba-wala or the tandoor artist was stealing their thunder. These guys were doing something unbelievably simple and still so impressive that our ancestral women just couldn’t let go. They carefully examined the cooks across North India and realized that these guys would give the fresh, crispy roti a big crush at the end before serving it. The crush would make a slight sound and unevenly distribute the remains of the roti’s upper crust. To the foodie, this simple torture technique yielded a magical result - the basic roti started looking exotic, as if it had been subjected to handcrafted ingenuity. Enter 2025, and our moms are still doing it. You would imagine forgiving the unsuspecting commercial cooks and letting go of this tactical move, but NO, they still do it, and honestly, it makes the roti taste even better, by at least 17% as per my psychological interpretation and the non-prevalent research team that I have in the underground bunker of a Scottish castle turned laboratory.

Looks like you are roti-wise uneducated & need the enlightenment!

For starters, you have to explore the various forms in which chapati prevails in your life. 

• To categorize each, have a few bites sans anything else to uncover the real taste.
• Fresh roti with yesterday’s dal vs Morning roti at night with fresh dal is a good learning curve to understand the intricacies.
• Try a roti this winter season with nothing but ghee and some sprinkled shakkar…the combination of cereal and sugarcane sweetness is just magical!
• Rotis that are too chewy are a big turn–off. The person making them clearly does not know the art.
• Roti with achaar is the poorest way to eat it, but remember, the genuinely poor souls might go to sleep without a morsel…count your blessings!
• Rotis play a significant role in keeping you away from the bane of the Western world’s health scare…Dread the Bread!

Roti can be a significant quality check for non-vegetarian dishes prepared at home. This is to test the gravy or the soupy part of the dish, especially the meats. Take a big bite, fold it, and dip it repeatedly until you are sure the roti bite has succumbed to your BDSM actions. Now, eat the roti without any meat or flesh. If it tastes damn good on the first bite…your dish is most likely to be loved.

Some Recommended Roti Explorations & Don’t Dos’ for You

• No combination with curd impresses - just stay away
• Try a warm one with some fresh mustard sauce smeared on it
• Wrap half a roti around a big mass of extra spicy pulao - just try it once
• Rotis don’t handle well with any type of salad - definitely worth a miss
• Never end a meal with a sabzi-less bite - kills the entire journey of supper
• Ask your chief of staff to try preparing the dough with some milk

Small morsels of roti in a big bowl of soupy black grams win over 30 minutes spent with friends talking about EMIs and smoking away. For once, compliment the women in your home for the Roti itself and not reserve the kind words for 7-star dishes - without that nonchalant piece of dough, you wouldn’t have grown up if you happened to have a middle-class Indian upbringing!

Somewhere between loneliness and loyalty, between guilt and grace, lies the quiet exchange that happens when a person rescues a dog. It’s marketed as compassion — a simple act of kindness, but emotionally, it’s far more complicated. To save a dog from neglect, abandonment, or euthanasia is to participate in a deeply human ritual: the desire to mend something that mirrors our own brokenness. Every October 22, Make a Dog’s Day returns as both an adoption campaign and a cultural moment of confession — when we collectively try to prove we still know how to care. The campaign’s tone is light, often sponsored by automakers or pet brands, but beneath it lies a psychological truth that is neither cute nor commercial. When we save dogs, we often save fragments of ourselves that have long been waiting for rescue.