Visions of a Grand Life During Crisis: Positive Manifestation or Aimless Daydreaming?

Crisis has a way of inflating the imagination. When life contracts—financially, emotionally, physically—the mind often expands in the opposite direction. People who feel cornered begin to picture spacious futures. Success appears vividly. Recognition feels inevitable. A better version of life waits just beyond the present difficulty, fully formed and strangely detailed. This is often described as manifestation, framed as optimism with intent. Other times, it is dismissed as escapism, a refusal to engage with reality. Neither explanation quite captures what is happening. The visions arrive uninvited, sometimes embarrassingly grand, sometimes soothing enough to make the present moment tolerable. They do not feel strategic. They feel necessary. The question is not whether these fantasies are useful or delusional. The question is why they appear so reliably when things are falling apart.

7 Ways in Which You Can Pamper Your Prostate Health Every Day after 40s

“Pampering the Prostate: The Quiet Health Ritual Men Refuse to Admit They Need”

There comes a moment, usually sometime after forty, when a man realizes that his body has quietly rewritten the terms of their relationship. The signals arrive subtly at first — a slower stream, a nighttime interruption, a faint discomfort that feels too undignified to mention. Yet instead of acknowledging these changes, many men wrap themselves in the old myth of invincibility, the cultural fiction that the body should endure without complaint so long as the mind wills it to.

Not Sure if Amitriptyline Suits Your Symptoms? Scan My Tryptomer Experiences

I have been taking Tryptomer on and off for more than a decade. It was prescribed to me for GAD - Generalized Anxiety Disorder - that still remains and keeps surfacing in ways that are hard to describe. The primary salt here is Amitriptyline. If you Google it, it shows up as a tricyclic antidepressant. This also means that this prescription medicine has been around for a long time. Tricyclic antidepressants are considered a bit old school in terms of their pharmacology age. Chances are high that if you have been visiting a psychologist lately, this drug might not show up at all among all the possible salts that could help you. Yes, it is intended as a long-term use prescription medication.

It is not meant for short-term measures, such as controlling the sudden onset of anxiety. This makes Tryptomer an unlikely contender to be recommended for someone who is still within the initial rounds of consulting, still young to understand how mind medications work, and how it takes a measured combination of some salts to first conquer the immediate symptoms, then provide longer-term relief, and then become a part of your long-term strategy to keep away the symptoms. If you are worried about any of the depression prevention or anxiety control medications becoming a chronic part of your life, stay away from Tryptomer. Like I said, it is typically used as a long-term measure, and people using it for a decade or a couple of decades is quite common. If you Google search the typical applications of Tryptomer, things like nerve-related pain relief show up, but honestly, it does not have pain-relieving effects, and assuming that it will work wonders to reduce bodily pains induced by a constant state of anxiety is just expecting a bit too much. Most of the pharmacy stores don't store this medicine in large quantities.

The old-world charm has perhaps faded away entirely, but it is effective for me, where I have a combination of GAD and anxiety-linked IBS. There is something surprisingly effective about how Tryptomer has helped me in controlling diarrhea-predominant IBS symptoms. That constant sense of worry about untimely bowel movement and sudden changes in body weight was first controlled via Tryptomer. Initially, when my symptoms were acute, I needed as much as 75 mg Tryptomer daily, divided across 3 equal doses of 25 mg each. It takes a bit of time to build up. Give it a week, and if you have been suffering from IBS associated with anxiety or depression, Tryptomer should give you some remarkable results.

Never take it on an empty stomach! This is one rule I have followed for the longest time. Take it after meals, and be patient with it. Tryptomer will get the job done, but if you suffer from acute panic attacks, this is not the best option. For me, getting hooked on to Tryptomer happened after trying and failing at least 4 other prescription drugs, including Valium, Anti-Dep, Tancodpe, and Fluoxetine. Valium is just a short-term sedative at best. I believe it presents the highest chance of abuse. When you are really choking with anxiety, any medication that can give you quick symptomatic relief also presents a higher probability of causing substance abuse. This is where I have done well to be patient, giving each of the prescription drugs for anxiety control some time before trying the next one.

Tryptomer has a stomach-binding effect. Hard to explain in strictly medical terms, but understand it like this - it tends to tighten up and cement the nerves that connect your gut to your mind. This is as basic a definition as you will find online. As a result, the typical symptoms of IBS-D associated with long-term sufferers, such as acidity, bloating, undigested food, and cramping, are controlled with Tryptomer. Yes, the pitfall of sudden weight gain is there, but it is not the drug alone that is at work. Like most psychotic medications, Tryptomer can make you a bit sleepier, and this is when your daily schedule should help you keep away from gaining too much. For many people, Tryptomer is an outdated medication for those with classical, textbook symptoms of depression or anxiety, but for me, it has really worked! 

If you tend to believe medical wisdom borrowed from Google searches, you are likely to find that Tryptomer has been used for migraine prevention and for serious sleep issues. The latter scenario might still work in higher dosages. But, to be used as a means of extreme, splitting headache caused by a flare-up at home or office? Tryptomer would not be my recommendation! 

• AVAILABILITY: not that easy to find in Delhi NCR.
• EASE OF USE: try to take it after meals.
• SIDE EFFECTS: dry mouth and bloating might happen at the outset.
• SEDATION ISSUES: not that serious.
• ANTI-DEPRESSANT EFFECTS: moderate to good over a period.
• ANXIETY CONTROL EFFECTS: good in low dosages and longer periods.
• IBS CONTROL CAPABILITIES: impressive for IBS-D sufferers.
• INSOMNIA SUPPORT: reasonably good without being extreme.
• CONSTIPATION PROBABILITY: a bit higher than other substitutes.
• KICK-IN PERIOD: at least a week, as a minimum.
• RANGE OF INTERACTIONS: not much, rather limited.

Why Do Some People Hug the Edge While Others Own the Middle? The Psychology of Driving Alignment

The Unspoken Geometry of the Indian Road: Every country has its own dialect of chaos. Ours speaks through horns, swerves, and that mystical choreography only Indian drivers understand. Watch any road long enough, and you’ll notice two kinds of people: those who clutch the edge like their tires are afraid of oxygen, and those who drive like they’ve been granted diplomatic immunity from lanes altogether. The former tremble at the sight of oncoming headlights; the latter treat the road as a chessboard where everyone else is just a pawn. What we call “driving style” is really psychological cartography—an emotional GPS that maps our fears, egos, and neuroses onto asphalt. Whether you hug the side or straddle the center isn’t random. It’s habit, yes, but also personality, trauma, status, and sometimes, just the ghost of your driving instructor whispering, “Beta, left mein hi rakhna.” And while the West has its orderly lanes and 40-minute debates about “lane discipline,” in India, the lane is a philosophical suggestion—optional, flexible, and often existential.

Are They Helpless or Hustling? The Uncomfortable Truth of Urban Begging in India

Air-conditioned air holds differently at a red light. From behind tempered glass, the city appears in slow motion: a child with a box of tissues; a man with a gauze-wrapped stump; a woman carrying a sleeping toddler whose head lolls with a suspicious stillness you don’t want to believe; a knock on the window—polite first, then insistent. You look ahead, counting down the signal, bargaining with your conscience. Maybe this person is gaming you. Maybe there’s a “racket.” Maybe it’s safer to do nothing. Yet the hand on the glass is a mirror; it reflects the unease of a country where modern prosperity idles inches from profound precarity. This essay traces the fault line that runs between the driver’s doubt and the beggar’s plea: the law that criminalized and then partly decriminalized begging; the religious traditions that sanctified alms; the economics of India’s informal city; and the psychology that makes strangers’ suffering feel negotiable. What emerges is neither a defense of every outstretched palm nor a condemnation of every refusal, but an attempt to look squarely at how a society chooses to see—or not see—its poor.

From Windshield Morality to Street-Level Reality

The judgment many Indians make at traffic signals—are they helpless or hustling?—is not simply a snap moral verdict; it’s a story we tell ourselves to live with contradiction. Researchers call one engine of that story the just-world hypothesis: the comforting belief that, broadly, people get what they deserve. When that belief is threatened by visible suffering, people explain it away—by inflating the supposed failings of those who suffer, or by minimizing their own obligation to respond. In the micro-theater of a red light, this bias is reinforced by compassion fade and the identifiable-victim effect: we feel for the single vivid face but shut down as the faces multiply, converting a human encounter into a policy problem that belongs to “the government.” None of this proves that every beggar is honest or coerced; it shows that most drivers’ certainty about who is “faking” is often a psychological convenience more than an evidence-based conclusion. To get past convenience, we have to look beyond the glass: at data on homelessness and homelessness, at migration and disability, at the legal status of begging, and at how cities actually work for people with no cushion.

Counting the Unseen: What the Numbers Say (and Don’t)

India’s official lens on the street poor is imperfect by design; the homeless are hard to count and easy to ignore. The 2011 Census enumerated 1.77 million homeless people nationwide—about 15 per 10,000—with 938,000 in urban areas; Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra led absolute counts, and sex ratios were starkly skewed among the homeless. Civil society networks argue the true figures run higher, and city-level snapshots are volatile: Delhi has swung from ~16,000 in a DUSIB 2014 count to claims of 150,000–300,000 sleeping rough in recent surveys and press reports; the range itself signals chronic under-measurement and policy drift. Meanwhile, a nontrivial share of people on pavements are interstate migrants, the mentally ill, the elderly without kin, and people with untreated disabilities—groups that face the sharp end of urban informality. Data gaps do not absolve anyone; they indict our measurement priorities. If we cannot even agree on how many are outside, our debates about “rackets” risk substituting suspicion for statistics.

(Sources: Census 2011 homeless abstracts; HLRN briefings; recent reportage on Delhi homelessness.)

Law and Order—or Order without Law? The 2018 Decriminalization and After

For decades, Indian states relied on the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 (and its extensions) to arrest, detain, and “rehabilitate” people for the act of asking for alms. In 2018, the Delhi High Court in Harsh Mander & Karnika Sawhney v. Union of India struck down key provisions of this law as unconstitutional—holding that criminalizing begging punishes people for systemic failures and violates the right to life and dignity. Journalistic and legal commentary called it a watershed: the capital could no longer treat destitution as a crime. In 2021, amid COVID-era pleas, the Supreme Court added an important note of caution: the Court “would not take an elitist view” to ban begging, emphasizing that people beg in the absence of education and employment, and directing governments to focus on vaccination and rehabilitation rather than removal. Decriminalization, however, is not the same as support. Without robust shelter capacity, mental-health services, and income pathways, the end of arrest simply leaves people to the same signals. The law can stop adding harm; it cannot by itself create help.

(Sources: Delhi HC judgment; Reuters coverage; legal analyses; SC remarks reported by national dailies.)

From Bhiksha and Dāna to the Red Light: India’s Long History of Alms

To see roadside begging only as a nuisance is to forget India’s civilizational memory of alms giving. In Hindu traditions, bhiksha (alms) and dāna (charity) emerge from Vedic and classical texts, mapping a repertoire that includes support for renunciants, students, and the poor; in Buddhism, dāna is the first perfection and the beginning of a moral path; in Sikhism, langar collapses hierarchy through shared food; in Islam, zakat binds the prosperous to the needy. That history does not sanctify every knock on the glass; it contextualizes it. Colonial and post-colonial governments reframed mendicancy as a problem of order, severing alms from ethics and poverty from policy. Today’s discomfort—“shouldn’t they work?”—is an inheritance of that pivot. Our past recognized the poor as a moral claim on the community; our present often treats them as an administrative inconvenience. The question is not whether alms “solve” poverty (they do not). It is whether a society with deep traditions of giving can modernize its compassion without outsourcing it to suspicion.

(Sources: doctrinal overviews of bhiksha/dāna; cultural essays on Indian giving; Buddhist teachings on dāna.)

Economics at the Signal: Informality, Income, and the ‘Racket’ Narrative

Few topics inflame middle-class conversations like the “organized begging mafia.” Rigorous, national-scale evidence is thin; local police busts and investigative features do find coercive rings that exploit children or the disabled. There are also credible studies documenting forced begging as trafficking, particularly of minors. But between the denial (“it’s all genuine”) and the generalization (“it’s all a racket”), reality is mixed. The informal economy is India’s largest employer of last resort; for those shut out—because of injury, addiction, psychosis, documents, language, caste prejudice—begging is sometimes the only remaining margin. Daily “earnings” vary wildly by city, junction, time, and police pressure; the modal state is not scam, but precocity. A serious response must do two things at once: prosecute coercion where it exists, and provide exits where it does not. Otherwise, the “mafia” story becomes a moral alibi that lets cities ignore the far larger population of unorganized, unprotected poor in plain sight.

(Sources: social-science papers on begging in India; policy briefs; SSRN/legal overviews on trafficking/forced begging.)

Disability, Illness, and the Edges of Employability

One reason the “just get a job” refrain rings hollow is that a visible share of beggars are people with disabilities—amputations, untreated infections, congenital impairments—often compounded by mental illness or substance dependence. India’s labor market is unforgiving even for the able-bodied poor; for those with psychosis, epilepsy, or intellectual disability, reality is brutal: employers shun, families fracture, documentation lapses, medication is unaffordable, relapse is frequent. Women face layered risks: abandonment, intimate-partner violence, trafficking, and the burdens of caregiving without cash. When “employability” is invoked as a cudgel, it ignores these frictions. Any ethical urban response has to start with low-barrier shelters, assertive outreach, harm-reduction, and ID recovery, and only then speak of skilling. A city that cannot keep someone clean, fed, and medicated cannot credibly demand productivity from them.

(Sources: homelessness and shelter reports; ministry briefs; clinical and NGO literature on mental illness and street survival.)

Why We Doubt: Just-World Beliefs, Compassion Fade, and the Single Face

Back at the red light, psychology explains some of our worst instincts. The just-world bias pushes us to assume people deserve their lot; scope insensitivity dulls our empathy as numbers rise; the identifiable-victim effect makes us more generous to the single story than the crowd. We also rationalize non-giving with stories of fraud, whether or not we’ve verified them. These cognitive shortcuts serve a purpose: they protect us from burnout and help us navigate relentless exposure to need. But they also distort moral vision, turning structural failures into individual blame. The antidotes are not heroic: give through channels you trust; if you decline, do so without contempt; stay curious about the causes you cannot see; and remember that evidence beats anecdotes. The person at your window is neither proof that charity works nor proof that it doesn’t; they are evidence that the social contract frays exactly where the city is most shiny.

(Sources: classic and contemporary research on just-world beliefs; compassion fade; identifiable-victim literature.)

Children at the Window: Protection First, Not Policing Alone

Nothing polarizes drivers like children selling pens or tapping on glass after 10 pm. The Juvenile Justice framework and anti-trafficking laws already recognize child begging as exploitation, requiring rescue, shelter, and family tracing. But “rescue” is not a photo-op; without follow-through—de-addiction, schooling, case-work, income support for families—children boomerang back to the same junctions, now smarter and more cynical. The public dramatizes “drugging rings” (some cases are real), yet often ignores migratory poverty that pushes families to put children to work. Effective city practice looks boring: night shelters that are safe, bridge schools, cash-plus support for caregivers, and police trained in child protection, not harassment. Outrage fades when the signal turns green; the child’s problem does not.

(Sources: JJ Act materials; NGO field reports; trafficking literature and media reports.)

Policy Pivot: From Handcuffs to Rehabilitation (The SMILE Experiment)

If criminalization failed, what replaces it? The Union government’s SMILE umbrella scheme (Support for Marginalized Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise) launched in 2022 includes a sub-scheme for the Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Persons Engaged in Begging (guidelines updated Oct 2023). It funds identification, counseling, shelter, skilling, and reintegration through local bodies and NGOs. Early numbers suggest ambition exceeds capacity: one independent analysis cites roughly 9,958 people identified across 81 cities, with ~970 rehabilitated—a start, not a solution. City showcases (e.g., Indore’s “beggar-free” claim) report training, product lines, and family reunification; other cities are just beginning baseline surveys. SMILE’s promise is in coordination—health, police, child-protection, shelters, IDs, jobs—yet that is precisely where Indian urban governance frays. Decriminalization opened the door; delivery will decide whether people step through it.

(Sources: official SMILE pages, guidelines, and PIB notes; independent policy analyses; recent news on city pilots.)

Era-Gone-By vs. Today: From Mendicants to Margins of the Metropolis

In older India, the mendicant occupied a paradoxical prestige: renunciation conferred moral authority, and giving to the monk was a merit practice. Urban modernity flips the valence: market logic prizes productivity; the non-earning poor become an eyesore, not an ethical claim. The same society that funds temple kitchens and gurudwara langars flinches at a boy knocking on an SUV window. This is not hypocrisy so much as dislocation: the institutions that historically managed charity (kinship, guild, temple, monastery) cannot absorb the scale and anonymity of migrant mega cities. The old script—householders give, monks receive—doesn’t cover a metropolis where the mendicant is neither monk nor neighbor. If we want compassion that fits the city, we must update the channels: cashless street-giving into verified funds, corporate kitchens linked to shelters, municipal dashboards that show real-time needs, and philanthropy that flows to boring operations, not just branded moments.

(Sources: cultural histories of alms; contemporary urban policy commentary.)

What Drivers Can Do: Between Cynicism and Sentimentality

Two reflexes fail us at red lights: sentimentality (give indiscriminately to feel good) and cynicism (never give because “it’s all a scam”). A saner middle path starts with clarity: if you choose to give in person, prefer food, water, sanitary supplies, or QR-linked donations to vetted shelters; if you choose not to, don’t demean. Support night-shelter ecosystems, harm-reduction, and community kitchens that outlast a signal cycle. Vote and volunteer for city capacity: shelters with women-safe spaces, mental-health linkages, and outreach teams that speak migrants’ languages. Ask your ward Councillor one boring question: How many functional shelter beds exist tonight within 3 km, and who checks? Above all, keep judgment provisional. A society that sees every beggar as a thief will design policy like a lockbox; a society that sees every beggar as a saint will neglect systems. The work is to build systems sturdy enough that neither myth is necessary.

(Sources: practice notes from shelters and city pilots; behavioral science on giving.)

The Hardest Sentence: Some Are Coerced, Many Are Cornered

Yes, coercion exists; yes, there are gangs; yes, children are exploited. These require policing that is rights-literate and prosecutions that stick. But the larger truth is duller and more devastating: many who beg are cornered by structural scarcity—no address to get an ID, no ID to get a benefit, no benefit to stop a slide. Others are pulled under by illness, addiction, grief, or disability. To call this “easy money” is to confess distance from the street. None of this obliges anyone to hand out coins at signals; it obliges a city to stop recycling the poor between junctions, lock-ups, shelters, and pavements. When you feel the urge to explain away the hand at your window, try a harder thought: what would it take for this person to not be here next month? If your answer begins and ends with “they should work,” you have described your hope, not their options.

Reflection: The Glass is Thinner Than It Looks

The moral comfort of the driver’s seat is an illusion. The glass is not a wall; it is a lens that magnifies our stories about worth, work, and waste. The beggar might be hustling, helpless, coerced, recovering, or simply surviving today to try again tomorrow. The city will contain all of these truths until it chooses an architecture of care strong enough to make signal-side charity unnecessary. Until then, our ethics at red lights should be modest: refuse contempt, resist convenient myths, and route generosity into channels that outlast a green light. The goal is not to romanticize begging or giving; it is to retire the question by building a city where no one has to ask it.

References

• Delhi High Court Judgment (Harsh Mander & Anr. v. UOI & Ors., 08 Aug 2018) – PDF copy via HLRN: https://hlrn.org.in/documents/HC_Delhi_Decriminalisation_of_Begging.pdf
• Harsh Mander & Anr. vs UOI & Ors., text via Indian Kanoon: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/117834652/
• Reuters (Thomson Reuters Foundation). “Begging is not a crime, Delhi High Court rules.” https://www.reuters.com/article/world/begging-is-not-a-crime-delhi-high-court-rules-idUSKBN1KU1FG/
• IDR (India Development Review). “The decriminalisation of begging.” https://idronline.org/decriminalisation-of-begging/
• Supreme Court remarks on pleas during COVID (“won’t take an elitist view”): Times of India report. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cant-take-elitist-view-to-ban-begging-supreme-court/articleshow/84809917.cms
• The Economic Times (SC remarks, 27 Jul 2021). https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/wont-take-elitist-view-of-banning-beggars-from-streets-says-sc-on-plea-for-their-rehab-amid-covid/articleshow/84785407.cms
• NDTV (SC remarks). https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/wont-take-elitist-view-of-banning-beggars-from-streets-supreme-court-2496375
• Census of India 2011 – Houseless (PCA HS, district level): https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/5047
• Census summary (houseless overview). https://www.census2011.co.in/houseless.php
• HLRN (Homelessness overview; urban numbers). https://hlrn.org.in/homelessness
• Population Association of America paper (houseless metrics based on 2011). https://paa2019.populationassociation.org/uploads/190986
• Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment – SMILE scheme overview. https://socialjustice.gov.in/schemes/99
• SMILE sub-scheme guidelines (Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Persons Engaged in Begging). https://grants-msje.gov.in/display-smile-guidelines
• PIB press release on SMILE allocations (12 Feb 2022 launch; outlays). https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1806161
• Lok Sabha starred question annex (SMILE-B guidelines issued 23.10.2023). https://sansad.in/getFile/loksabhaquestions/annex/183/AU3583_HdFtsx.pdf?source=pqals
• IMPRI policy note on SMILE outcomes and constraints (2025). https://www.impriindia.com/insights/support-marginalized-individual-scheme/
• Just-world hypothesis primer and sources (Lerner 1980; Rubin & Peplau 1975). https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/just-world-hypothesis
• Lerner, M. J. The Belief in a Just World (book chapter overview). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5_2
• Identifiable-victim/singularity effects (open-access article, 2024). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10977801/
• Meta-analysis on compassion fade (2019). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597818302930
• Wisdom Library – Bhiksha (concept and sources). https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/bhiksha
• Overview of alms giving traditions (Hindu/Buddhist context). https://www.hinduwebsite.com/buddhism/practical/dana_praciceofgiving.asp
• SSRN article (legal status, organized exploitation, SMILE). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/5208299.pdf?abstractid=5208299&mirid=1
• Social Science Journal PDF (2020) on begging causes/implications incl. organized exploitation claims. https://www.socialsciencejournal.in/assets/archives/2020/vol6issue6/9041-535.pdf
• Times of India (2025) – City-level homelessness and shelter capacity debates (Delhi). https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/lakhs-homeless-in-delhi-little-planning-on-their-relief/articleshow/121523850.cms
• Times of India (2025) – Indore’s SMILE showcase as “beggar-free city.” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/indore/indore-shows-the-way-to-a-beggar-free-city-at-national-workshop/articleshow/122394750.cms

A Brush with Rebellion: The Power of Makeup in Protest Through History

Makeup, often dismissed as a mere tool for beautification, has a deeper, richer history woven with threads of protest and empowerment. From ancient civilizations to contemporary movements, makeup has been utilized as a medium for self-expression, resistance, and assertion of power. This article takes you on a journey through time, exploring the fascinating evolution of makeup as a potent symbol of protest and strength.

Ancient Roots:

In the ancient world, civilizations such as Egypt and Mesopotamia laid the groundwork for using cosmetics not only for aesthetic purposes but also as a means of social and political expression. Both men and women adorned themselves with elaborate makeup, using kohl and pigments to signify status, protection, and sometimes dissent.

Medieval Europe:

As Europe transitioned through the Middle Ages, makeup faced scrutiny as the Church condemned its usage. Despite societal restrictions, some women employed cosmetics to challenge societal norms subtly. Red lipstick, for instance, became a clandestine symbol of rebellion and resilience.

Anxiety | Mental Health | Lionel Messi - It Happens to the Best!

This discussion about mental health, anxiety, and how being anxious chronically can happen to the best, people as good and great as Lionel Messi, is inspired by this article by Adam Alter, on Ideas.Ted.com

For many people, when celebrities talk about mental health issues, it becomes a bit easier to comprehend the problem and understand that it can happen to anybody irrespective of the amount of inherent talent or the fandom that comes with being the best in anything, ranging from movies to soccer. The latter has its smart, Messi, whose psychological challenges of holding up his performance in the middle of a growing, global fan following. The problems with Messi' preparedness for the big stage have been doing the rounds for some time. Reports suggest that he usually vomits and according to some sources, his vomiting is a bit of a chronic thing that tends to happen en route to a big match. It was in 2014 that reports emerged about Messi showing symptoms of vomiting and perhaps, the condition being associated with trouble in handling anxiety.

For those who have IBS in the times of Corona Pandemic

If you have a history of IBS, it is most likely that no one and I mean not even the most qualified physician out there, would have been able to fully understand your set of symptoms -  that is the problem with IBS, it is highly symptomatic and very unpredictable. That is how complicated IBS can be but strangely, despite all the medicinal and guidance-based support, nobody really understands what the sufferer is put through. At this time, when the Corona scare is at its worst, you need to double-up your layers of protection to ensure a flare-up is prevented. For starters, the Corona global pandemic is about a lot of cynical views around you - don't let this get you into that space where you start believing that the world is coming to an end. It looks like it but in reality, we will bounce back - everyday folks like you and me and the governments that are responsible for protecting us. Don't read too much into how much worse it can get. The idea is to control your anxiety levels on a daily basis since right now when the more normal Joe seems to be slightly frantic.

Helping at the shelter can be self-therapeutic, self-healing...selfish

I have been watching YouTube videos recently, and so many have volunteers working at animal shelters. I get the feeling that a lot of these folks are working purely out of undefined compassion and love for animals. There is no other way to explain it. Nobody can be motivated by a branded t-shirt that a shelter provides, perhaps three times a year, to spend that much time with animals, working with animals that are often injured, horrifically uncared for, and often in a state of neglect that seems frightening. But then, I also see the other side of it. Some people need this to heal themselves, placate a mind that wanders too much, or often give way to temptations that are highly destructive. Helping at the shelter also has to be a healing mechanism, about creating hours within a day, week, or month that help to manage a sense of loss, regrets that won’t go away, or anxieties that seem to emerge out of nowhere. In the end, the shelter ecosystem seems like the perfect blend of some professionals, some volunteers who just want to be around animals or help, and others who see this as therapy without pills. Is it perfect? No. Just like families are not meant to function flawlessly, but they often give way to people with happy childhoods and lives well lived…

BEYOND PERSONAL OPINIONS: SHARING SOME INFORMATION ABOUT THIS SUBJECT GATHERED FROM THE WEB

Is helping at the animal shelter a part of prisoner reforms?

Helping at an animal shelter can be a part of prisoner reform programs, as it can provide prisoners with valuable skills and experiences that can help them reintegrate into society upon their release. Programs that involve prisoners working with animals at animal shelters can provide prisoners with opportunities to learn responsibility, compassion, and teamwork. These programs can also help to reduce the stress and anxiety that many prisoners experience while incarcerated. Animal shelters can benefit from this type of program as well, as they are often short-staffed and can use the help of volunteers. There are several different programs that involve prisoners working with animals at animal shelters. Some programs involve prisoners caring for and training animals, while others involve prisoners providing administrative or maintenance support. These programs are usually offered through partnerships between animal shelters, correctional facilities, and non-profit organizations. It's worth noting that these programs are not always easy to implement and require careful planning and coordination between the involved parties to ensure the welfare of both the animals and the prisoners.

Why helping at animal shelters can help someone struggling with grief?

Helping at animal shelters can be beneficial for someone who is struggling with grief because it can provide a sense of purpose and a sense of accomplishment. Caring for animals can also be a way to honor the memory of a loved one who had a special connection with animals. Working with animals can also provide a sense of comfort and companionship, which can be especially important for someone who is grieving. Interacting with animals can help to reduce stress and anxiety, and can also help to improve mood and overall well-being. Being around animals can also be therapeutic; it can provide a sense of calmness and non-judgmental companionship, which can be helpful for someone who is experiencing grief. Animals don't hold grudges, they don't judge, and they don't have expectations, which can be a comforting and healing environment for someone who is struggling with grief. Additionally, helping at an animal shelter can also provide a sense of community and belonging. It can be a way to connect with others who have similar interests and can be a way to feel like you are making a positive impact in the world. It's worth noting that grief is a complex and individual experience, and what works for one person may not work for another. It's important to understand that helping at an animal shelter should be one of the many coping strategies that a person can use to deal with their grief, and it's important to seek professional help if needed.

Which precautions should you take when visiting an animal shelter for the first time?

When visiting an animal shelter for the first time, there are several precautions that you should take in order to ensure the safety and well-being of both the animals and yourself. Follow the rules: Each animal shelter has its own set of rules and regulations, so it's important to follow them at all times. This may include things like not disturbing the animals while they are eating or sleeping, not entering certain areas of the shelter without permission, and not interacting with certain animals without permission.

Be mindful of your own health: Many animal shelters have animals that may be carrying diseases or parasites, so it's important to take precautions to protect yourself. This may include things like washing your hands frequently, wearing gloves or other protective gear, and not touching your face or eating while in the shelter.

Respect the animals: It's important to remember that the animals at the shelter are there because they have been abandoned or neglected, so they may be frightened or nervous. It's important to be gentle and calm when interacting with them and to respect their boundaries.

Be prepared: If you are planning on adopting an animal, it's important to be prepared by bringing the necessary items, such as a leash and collar, food, and a bed. Additionally, you should also be prepared to fill out paperwork and go through an interview process.

Be patient: Adopting an animal is a big responsibility, and it's important to take your time to find the right pet for you and your family. It's important to consider the animal's personality, breed, and specific needs when making a decision.

Have realistic expectations: Not all animals are perfect, and not all animals will be a perfect fit for your home. It's important to have realistic expectations when visiting an animal shelter and be open to the idea that the animal you adopt may have some behavior issues that need to be worked on.

Why are animal shelter Instagram stories often staged?

Animal shelter Instagram stories are often staged to showcase the animals in the most positive and appealing way possible, in order to increase their chances of being adopted. Shelters often use professional photographers or volunteers to take pictures and videos of the animals in a way that highlights their best features and personalities. This can include things like dressing the animals up in cute outfits, arranging them in playful poses, and taking photos and videos in a clean and well-lit environment. Staging the photos and videos in this way can help to show the animals in their best light and can help to make them more appealing to potential adopters. It can also help to showcase the personality and unique characteristics of each animal, which can help potential adopters connect with them and imagine them as part of their family. It's important to note that while the stories and photos may be staged, the shelters still provide accurate information about the animals' background, health condition, and any other important information that the adopters should know before adopting. It's also worth mentioning that animal shelters have the goal to find loving and caring homes for the animals they take care of, which is a noble cause, and they are using different techniques to achieve that goal.

Can you adopt at an animal shelter without bringing the animal home?

Some animal shelters offer the option to adopt an animal without bringing them home immediately. This type of adoption is often referred to as "foster to adopt" or "trial adoption." It allows potential adopters to take an animal home on a trial basis to see if the animal is a good fit for their home and lifestyle before making a final decision to adopt. Foster-to-adopt programs allow potential adopters to provide a temporary home for an animal while the shelter continues to search for a permanent home. This can be especially beneficial for animals that may have special needs or may be recovering from an illness or injury.

During the foster period, the shelter will provide all necessary supplies, such as food, medication, and any other necessary items. The adopter will be responsible for providing a loving and nurturing home, as well as regular updates on the animal's health and behavior.

At the end of the foster period, the adopter will have the option to adopt the animal permanently or to return the animal to the shelter. If the adopter decides to adopt, the shelter will then finalize the adoption process, which will include signing the adoption contract and paying the adoption fee. It's worth noting that not all animal shelters offer this type of adoption, and the process and requirements can vary depending on the shelter. It's important to check with the shelter if they have such a program and what the requirements are before making a decision.

Does helping at the animal shelter give you any type of tax relief?

Helping at an animal shelter can be a rewarding experience, but it does not typically provide any specific tax relief. However, if the animal shelter is a non-profit organization that is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, donations made to the shelter may be tax-deductible. This means that if you make a monetary donation to the animal shelter, you may be able to claim a tax deduction for the donation amount on your federal income tax return. It's important to note that this applies only to monetary donations, not to in-kind donations, such as volunteering time or goods.

It's also worth mentioning that tax laws can be complex, and it's always a good idea to consult a tax professional or the IRS for guidance on how to claim a tax deduction for charitable donations. However, volunteering at an animal shelter may help you to qualify for other tax benefits, such as mileage reimbursement for travel to and from the shelter, as long as you can prove that you were traveling for charitable purposes. In addition, if you are a business owner, you may be able to deduct the cost of supplies, such as food and bedding, that you donate to the animal shelter as a business expense. All in all, helping at an animal shelter can be a great way to give back to your community and make a difference, but it may not directly provide any tax relief.

Can you visit an animal shelter in India every day?

It depends on the specific animal shelter you are interested in visiting. Some animal shelters in India may have regular visiting hours and may allow visitors to come and see the animals every day, while others may have more limited visiting hours or may not allow visitors at all. It's important to check with the specific animal shelter you are interested in visiting to find out their visiting hours and policies. Many animal shelters in India have specific visiting hours and may require that you make an appointment or get permission before visiting. Some shelters may also have restrictions on the number of visitors allowed at one time. Additionally, it's important to note that animal shelters are not only for entertainment and visiting, it's a place where animals are taken care of and treated, so the animals' welfare should be the top priority. It's important to be respectful of the animals and their needs while visiting. It's also worth mentioning that some animal shelters in India are overcrowded and may not have the resources to accommodate frequent visitors, so it's important to consider the impact that your visit may have on the shelter and its animals before deciding to visit.

Is it a good idea to leave pets at an animal shelter when you are traveling overseas?

Leaving pets at an animal shelter when you are traveling overseas is not generally considered to be a good idea. Animal shelters are typically not set up to provide long-term care for pets and may not have the resources or the staff to provide the level of care that your pet needs. Additionally, animal shelters are often overcrowded, and your pet may not receive the attention and care that they need.

There are several alternatives to leaving your pet at a shelter while you are traveling. One option is to hire a pet sitter or a dog walker to take care of your pet while you are away. This can provide your pet with the care and attention they need while still allowing them to stay in the comfort of their own home. Another option is to board your pet at a kennel or a pet hotel. These facilities are often staffed by experienced pet care professionals who can provide your pet with the care and attention they need while you are away.

You can also ask friends or family members if they are willing to take care of your pet while you are away. This can provide your pet with a familiar and comfortable environment while you are away. It's also worth noting that it's not always possible to take your pet with you when you travel overseas, due to quarantine laws or other restrictions. In those cases, it's important to research and find a reputable and trustworthy pet boarding facility that can provide your pet with the best possible care while you are away.

Cold, supposedly sleek cans versus vintage-like glass bottles

This had to be by chance for sure...I have always had a strong opinion of soda cans being pretentious and trying hard to look cool. However, friends and colleagues have always had their opinion, saying that soda cans represent more hygiene and highlighting how, increasingly, people want everything to be better packaged and made more presentable. During a recent visit to a local market, I came across a bulk dealer's store that retails simple glass bottles. The dairy bottles that were once used to retail milk. These are making a comeback of sorts. As compared to the cans, I find them easier to grip, literally more transparent, and the roundedness brings about a retro feeling.